How Many 1st Term US Senators Will Lose in 2020?

At least one first-term incumbent has been defeated in 49 of the 53 election cycles during the direct election era

Just as Democrats were forced to defend an unusually high number of U.S. Senate seats in 2018, so too will Republicans in 2020 with 22 of the 34 seats on the ballot currently held by the GOP.

A majority of those 22 seats – 13 – are held by first-term incumbents: Dan Sullivan (Alaska), Martha McSally (Arizona), Tom Cotton (Arkansas), Cory Gardner (Colorado), David Perdue (Georgia), Joni Ernst (Iowa), Bill Cassidy (Louisiana), Cindy Hyde-Smith (Mississippi), Steve Daines (Montana), Ben Sasse (Nebraska), Thom Tillis (North Carolina), Mike Rounds (South Dakota), and Shelley Moore Capito (West Virginia).

By contrast, just a quarter of the Democratic seats are held by senators in their first term: Doug Jones (Alabama, pictured), Gary Peters (Michigan), and Tina Smith (Minnesota).

Over the decades, first-term U.S. Senators usually account for much less than half of the number of incumbents on a given cycle’s ballot, but not surprisingly have the most difficult time holding onto their seats.

Since 1914, over 52 percent of U.S. Senators who lost their seats were in their first term.

And it is almost a certainty that at least one such senator will be defeated in 2020.

Smart Politics reviewed the more than 1,900 U.S. Senate elections conducted since 1914 and found that at least one first term U.S. Senator was defeated in 49 of the 53 election cycles.

Overall, 364 U.S. Senators have been defeated during the last 53 cycles after the passage of the 17th Amendment.

Of these 364 incumbents, 191 were in their first-term, or 52.5 percent of those who fell in defeat at either the nomination or general election phase.

[Note: This tally does not include an additional 11 U.S. Senators who were elected to one term, were then appointed just a few days or weeks prior to the start date of that term, and were then defeated when seeking what was technically a third term, not a second. This practice (to boost seniority over fellow classmates) is no longer permitted in the chamber.]

Over the past century-plus, an average of 3.6 first-term U.S. Senators have gone down to defeat per cycle.

The only cycles during which a first-term incumbent did not suffer such a defeat were in 1960, 1990, 2004, and 2010 – cycles in which there was a relatively low number of those seeking reelection for the first time: just seven in 1960, eight in 1990, six in 2004, and eight in 2010.

By contrast, there were a dozen first-term U.S. Senators seeking reelection in 2012, 14 in 2014, 15 in 2016, 14 in 2018, and the aforementioned 15 are expected to do so in 2020.

Over the decades, there has been a notable change in the number of U.S. Senators who have been defeated at the ballot box. For the first 50 years of direct elections from 1914 through 1964, a total of 232 U.S. Senators were defeated in their quest for another term, or 8.9 per cycle. Over the last 52 years since 1966, that number has dropped to 4.9 per cycle (132 senators).

The cycle with the largest number of defeated incumbents came after the Great Depression during the Democratic landslide of 1932 when 14 U.S. Senators failed to win another term. Four of those were in their first term: Democrat Walter Walker of Colorado and Republicans John Thomas of Idaho, Otis Glenn of Illinois, and John Blaine of Wisconsin.

The most first-term incumbents to suffer defeat came in 1918 with 10: Republican John Weeks of Massachusetts and Democrats John Shafroth of Colorado, Willard Saulsbury of Delaware, Thomas Hardwick of Georgia, J. Hamilton Lewis of Illinois, William Thompson of Kansas, James Vardaman of Mississippi, Xenophon Wilfley of Missouri, Henry Hollis of New Hampshire, and Christie Benet of South Carolina.

Nine lost in 1916 and 1926 with eight in 1930, and seven in 1922, 1938, 1942, and 1946.

No more than five first-term incumbents have lost in any election cycle since the 1950s.

Since 1992, the number of first-term senators who lost their seats has been fairly evenly divided between the Republicans (14) and Democrats (10):

  • 1992: Georgia Democrat Wyche Fowler and California Republican John Seymour
  • 1994: Pennsylvania Democrat Harris Wofford
  • 1996: Kansas Republican Sheila Frahm
  • 1998: Illinois Democrat Carol Mosely-Braun and North Carolina Republican Lauch Faircloth
  • 2000: Republicans Spence Abraham of Michigan, John Ashcroft of Missouri, and Rod Grams of Minnesota
  • 2002: Arkansas Republican Tim Hutchinson, Georgia Democrat Max Cleland, and Missouri Democrat Jean Carnahan
  • 2006: Republicans Jim Talent of Missouri and George Allen of Virginia
  • 2008: Republicans Norm Coleman of Minnesota, John Sununu of New Hampshire, and Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina
  • 2012: Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown
  • 2014: Democrats Mark Begich of Alaska, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, and Mark Udall of Colorado
  • 2016: New Hampshire Republican Kelly Ayotte
  • 2018: Democrats Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota

Could 2020 see as many as five first term senators lose their seats?

Probably not, although there are four particularly vulnerable senators in this group: Democrat Doug Jones of Alabama and Republicans Martha McSally of Arizona, Cory Gardner of Colorado, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

A strong Democratic cycle at the top of the ticket could also put the seats of Iowa’s Joni Ernst and Georgia’s David Perdue in jeopardy, although top-tier candidate recruitment has so far eluded the party to date.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

6 Comments on "How Many 1st Term US Senators Will Lose in 2020?"

  1. Hm, NONE of the first term incumbent senators is projected to lose in the PRIMARY election ? (of course, “Smart Politics” would be presumed to be closely following the intramural tussles, if any, of those in MN, IA, and SD. As for the seats farther afield…)

    • John Chessant | May 29, 2019 at 8:40 pm | Reply

      Some Republican PACs are reportedly trying to get Rep. Mark Walker (R-N.C.) to run against first-term incumbent Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). Senate Republicans are strongly discouraging such a move, but one doesn’t have to look far back to find an instance of a North Carolina Republican losing to a primary challenge from even further to the right. In 2018, Mark Harris, who ran in 2014 against Tillis, defeated Rep. Robert Pittinger (R-N.C.) in one of only two primary defeats for incumbent House Republicans that cycle (the other was Mark Sanford); famously, the general election was ruled to be fraudulent, with a special election to take place on September 10.

  2. 2. A number of first-term senators who initially won by narrow margins have gone on to win their (first) re-election bids by lopsided (double-digit) margins. Senator Sullivan of AK seems poised to be one of them. Will he garner a majority of the vote, something no candidate has attained since long-serving Republican T F Stevens did so in 2002?
    3. The Ds will have to defy (recent) history in order to seize control of the chamber. For starters, they surely must win in AZ (Unless she loses lopsidedly next year, McSally may actually end up becoming the nominee of her party for 3 consecutive Senate election cycles!). They also must win in all but one out of the following – CO, GA, IA, NC, and ME, where non-first-term incumbent Susan Collins may well be finally done in by a) her high-profile role in the Kavannagh SCOTUS fight last year; and b) the recently adopted “ranked choice voting” electoral system. This hypothetical scenario is predicated on a) the Ds losing their quest to take back the presidency; and b) Senator G D Jones of AL ultimately failing to hold on to his seat, perhaps even against Roy Moore in a higher-turnout rematch.

  3. John Chessant | May 29, 2019 at 9:09 pm | Reply

    There are also two senators in recent times who won a special election to fill the remainder of a term on the same day that they won a first full term, and were subsequently defeated for a second full term. These are Sen. Terry Sanford (D-N.C.) and Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.). (This is in addition to the already-noted senators who were appointed to the remainder of a term before starting their first full term.)

    Also elected only once before losing re-election was Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-R.I.), but Chafee was appointed more than a year before he won his first full term in 2000.

    A few first-term senators have also opted not to run for re-election in the face of near certain defeat. A recent example is Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who would have faced long odds in both the primary and general elections in 2018, had he run.

    RE: #2 above, the most prominent example of a senator who won a second term by a wide margin after only narrowly winning their first election is Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.). In 2002, Pryor defeated first-term Sen. Tim Hutchinson (R-Ark.) (brother of current governor Asa) by less than eight points. In 2008, no Republican filed to run against Pryor, and he won 79.5% of the vote against a Green Party candidate. Nevertheless, in 2014, Pryor lost re-election to current Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) by seventeen points.

    In Sullivan’s case, however, if he wins in 2020 then he will likely have a much more favorable environment in 2026 (regardless of whether Democrats next re-take the White House in 2020 or in 2024), so Pryor’s fate will likely not befall him.

  4. 4. “…364…191…52.5%…” Some of these ‘freshmen’ were such in the traditional sense. However, quite a few of these are partial first-termers, appointees, or ‘both’ (e.g. current presidential aspirant K Gillibrand, who was first appointed in ’09, then later elected to partial – still unexpired – term in ’10). I for one am mildly chagrined that this otherwise great report failed to differentiate among the different types of first-term Senate incumbents.

Leave a Reply to John Chessant Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*