Divided Nevada Legislature Enacts VBM for 2020

[Image via fineartamerica]

Nevada will send all voters a 2020 mail ballot as part of its response to the coronavirus pandemic after a party-line legislative vote passed emergency changes to the state’s election laws. The AP has more:

State lawmakers passed a bill Sunday that would add Nevada to a growing list of states that will mail all active voters ballots ahead of the November election amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The bill now heads to Gov. Steve Sisolak. If he signs it as expected, Nevada will join seven states that plan on automatically sending voters mail ballots, including California and Vermont, which moved earlier this summer to adopt automatic mail ballot policies.

The changes come in response to issues with the state’s primary, where limited polling places resulted in extremely long lines for voters choosing to vote in person. The new bill also requires at least one polling location per county and many more in population centers:

Limited polling places in Reno and Las Vegas resulted in lines of up to eight hours.

The U.S. Center for Disease Control has issued election guidance to provide a wide variety of voting options and limit crowds at polling places.

In the June primary, each county had one polling place except for Clark County, which had three throughout the Las Vegas area. Assembly Bill 4 requires at least 65 polling places throughout the state, including 35 in Clark County, which had 179 in the November 2018 election.

Christine Saunders of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada said the long waits in the June primary demonstrated why Nevada needs both mail and in-person voting opportunities.

“No one should have to choose between their health and voting. No one should have to choose between staying in line to vote and making it to their job on time,” she said.

Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske, a Republican, was opposed to the change, saying she wasn’t consulted and unsure where the additional funds to support it would come from:

In states such as Colorado and Oregon, which have mailed all voters ballots for years, the procedure is cheaper than holding an in-person election. But Cegavske said the equipment, education, printing and postage would cost the Secretary of State’s office an additional $3 million, not including costs to counties, which distribute and tabulate ballots.

Nevada spent more than $4 million in federal relief dollars in the June primary, most of which it funneled to counties. More than $1 million went toward leasing counting and sorting machines to accommodate a greater number of absentee ballots.

Cegavske, the state’s top election official and only Republican to hold statewide office, opposed the revised procedures. She blasted the Democratic-controlled Legislature for excluding her from discussions and said she saw a draft of the bill only a day before the vote in the state Assembly.

“We were not involved in this bill’s writing at all … I wish somebody would have asked us about because we could have told you what we had planned,” she said Friday.

The state’s Democratic legislature bypassed the SoS by giving the governor ultimate authority to make the VBM decision – including provisions allowing expanded ballot collection rules the GOP opposed:

To bypass Cegavske and enact the changes, the bill gives the governor the power to command the Secretary of State to adjust election procedures during a declared state of emergency. It passed on a party-line vote through both the state Senate and Assembly, with Democrats in favor and Republicans opposed. Republicans were particularly distressed with provisions of the bill that expand who is allowed collect and hand in ballots. They warned it would enable a practice detractors call “ballot harvesting,” in which volunteers working for political groups collect and turn in large quantities of ballots to tip the scales in elections.

“It’s a safeguard that our state I believe we need … I feel that taking it out — and it is in this bill — would be devastating, not only to us, but to our state,” Cegavske said.

Democrats argued allowing people other than family members to return ballots would help groups like members of Nevada’s 32 tribes, who have historically faced difficulty voting and live far form polling places and seniors – who may need assistance with voting and fear venturing to the polls.

In the June 2020 election, all voters were mailed ballots and 1.6% voted in-person on Election Day, a tiny share compared to the 34.2% that voted in-person in the November 2018 election.

Needless to say, this is a HUGE new change for 2020 in the Silver State – although the sharp partisan division is likely to mean continued clashes over the new policy in the run-up to November. Still, Nevada’s move to VBM is certain to spark further discussions in other states looking for solutions to the challenges of voting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stay tuned …

2 Comments on "Divided Nevada Legislature Enacts VBM for 2020"

  1. Interesting.This epidemic definitely will have an effect on people decisions who to vote this year.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*