Los Angeles County Goes Hollywood: Bloomberg Profile of New Voting System

Hollywood California: December 5th 2006. Cloudy backdrop for the famous Hollywood Sign

 

[Image courtesy of cater2.me]

Longtime readers of this blog are already very familiar with Los Angeles County’s groundbreaking voting system work – but recently that project got a national audience when it was profiled in a piece for BloombergPolitics. As you might expect, it’s a fascinating story told extremely well:

Last year, a bipartisan commission established by President Obama declared that the U.S. faces an “impending crisis in voting technology.” After the 2000 Florida recount showed the world that the American presidency could be determined by hanging chads, Congress set aside $3.3 billion, most of it to help local election officials upgrade their voting machinery. Bureaucrats with relatively little experience buying advanced technology rushed to purchase machines developed to satisfy the sudden demand. Those devices, designed in the years when Palm and Nokia owned the smartphone market, are mostly outdated. There’s no new money on the horizon, and even if local governments had the budgets for upgrades, they wouldn’t want the standard products currently available.

Now, Los Angeles County, the largest voting jurisdiction in the U.S., has hired IDEO, a design company with roots in Silicon Valley, to overhaul how it serves up democracy. IDEO has developed a touchscreen system that incorporates features familiar to voters used to scrolling and tapping. Election administrators across the country are closely watching the experiment. They want to know if L.A. can solve the problem of American voting. “For a long time people muttered that somebody should do something about this,” says Doug Chapin, who runs the University of Minnesota’s Program for Excellence in Election Administration. “What Los Angeles County is doing is just that.”

After the 2008 election drew record numbers to the polls, Dean Logan, L.A.’s top election official, decided it was time to replace the county’s obsolete machines, which are based on technology developed in the late 1960s. A nonprofit focused on helping disabled people vote connected him with IDEO, whose work includes creating Apple’s first mouse in 1980 and helping Bank of America use its website to encourage more savings in 2006. The county has signed two contracts with IDEO totaling $14.7 million. Logan has adopted IDEO’s philosophy and practices, such as keeping multicolored Post-it notes in his car for brainstorming sessions on the fly. “We wanted to focus on the voting experience,” he says. “We know if you have a bad experience the first time you vote, you have a lower chance of coming back.”

Los Angeles County has about 5 million registered voters, more than most states, and must print ballots in 11 languages, including Hindi, Khmer, and Tagalog. On any given election day, the county can print as many as 300 different ballots to cater to local races. And California’s ballots are long; in some years more than a dozen initiatives can be up for a vote alongside national, state, and local candidates, maxing out the number of questions that fit on the paper ballots.

IDEO studied voter behavior and found that, given California’s supersize ballots, people often arrive on Election Day with marked-up sample ballots. For those people, “voting is an exercise in transcription,” says Matt Adams, who’s leading the L.A. project. That prompted IDEO to create an interactive sample ballot voters can fill out on a computer or using a mobile app. When they go to vote, they can scan their code, like an airline boarding pass, from a paper printout or phone to automatically select their votes.

That’s the kind of insight that Logan, who started working in the election business as a temp the summer after high school, was hoping for when he hired IDEO. Logan set out a few basic parameters for the designers. Everyone had to be able to use the same device, whether they spoke Spanish, sat in a wheelchair, didn’t know how to Google, or were busy swiping right on Tinder. The system also had to produce paper ballots for an auditable trail. “You have competing interests,” Logan says. “Security and integrity don’t always parallel well with usability.”

In Texas, Travis County, which includes Austin, is also developing a new voting system, though it’s putting more emphasis on cryptography than design. The counties have gotten into hardware development because there simply isn’t a viable commercial market for election technology. Just four companies dominate the business, which is tightly regulated by state and federal commissions that must certify election software before it can be used. Merle King, who runs the Center for Election Systems at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, says the market is also plagued by inconsistent demand. Plenty of cities and counties need new machines, but it’s hard to predict when they’ll get the money to buy them. “Voting systems are infrastructure, and they have to compete with bridges, roads, ports, etc., for public funding,” he says. “There is a strong consensus that there will be no federal funding.”

In 2002, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act. California voters simultaneously approved $200 million to buy advanced machines. Across the country, local officials who manage elections flooded manufacturers with orders for touchscreen machines. Problems immediately became apparent. For one thing, researchers repeatedly showed the machines were vulnerable to hacking, prompting a wave of voter concern about security, though no U.S. election is known to have been attacked. The technology quickly fell behind as partisan wrangling stalled the confirmation of appointees to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, which sets standards. The last revision of testing criteria was in 2005, two years before the iPhone was introduced.

At the time, L.A. County decided not to buy into the new technologies. Instead, it adapted its old punch card Votamatic machines to let voters use special pens to mark ballots that get fed into scanners instead of punching out chads. The system, InkaVote Plus, is deployed to about 5,000 polling places each election. Logan hopes the 2016 election will be the last presidential ballot counted on InkaVote. By the end of next year, he plans to put contracts out to bid for the IDEO-designed systems, which must be certified by the state before they can be used on a trial basis in the 2018 gubernatorial election.

L.A. has roughly $60 million in federal and state funding that it never spent. That won’t be enough to furnish thousands of polling places with the IDEO-designed systems, so Logan’s plan depends on the state legislature reducing the number of sites. Lawmakers in Sacramento have been considering bills that would reduce reliance on voting machines altogether, by increasing access to voting by mail and consolidating in-person voting into a few large polling centers that are open longer. That would make it easier for Logan to put IDEO’s system into production, since it would require the government to buy fewer machines.

“It has to be modern, progressive, yet familiar,” says Blaise Bertrand, the head of IDEO’s design team. “If it’s too foreign, they’re not going to adapt to it.” The prototype—with headphones and remote controls for vision-impaired voters, legs that detach and fit into a wheeled carrying case, and a warm, wholly nonpartisan chartreuse exterior—is in the final design stages, and L.A. hopes to switch to the machines in time for the 2020 presidential election. Here’s how it might work:

1. Check in: Poll workers give voters a piece of paper with a QR code tied to their home address. The code tells the machine which ballot to display. IDEO pushed for the county to use heavy card stock, which Bertrand says will feel “substantial”—like the act of voting.

2. Get situated: Voters take the paper to the booth and put it into a scanner. Their choices appear on a touchscreen, which tilts downward so voters in wheelchairs can use it. A privacy filter keeps people walking by from seeing the screen.

3. Make selections: Voters are prompted to pick a language. The races and ballot measures they’re eligible to vote on are displayed on the screen. Voters make their selections and review their choices when they’re finished.

4. Cast the ballot: The machine prints the voters’ choices on the paper and spits it out so the voter can confirm it’s accurate. Then voters feed the paper back through the scanner into a ballot box. The ballots are then collected for tabulation at a central location.

Congratulations to Dean Logan and his team for their work – and thanks especially to Bloomberg reporter Karen Weise who spent considerable time asking the right questions and bringing this electiongeek success story to a wider audience. The next step for LA County is turning its ideas into reality – a crucial next step that many people (including me) can’t wait to see.

Stay tuned …

18 Comments on "Los Angeles County Goes Hollywood: Bloomberg Profile of New Voting System"

  1. “Last year, a bipartisan commission established by President Obama declared that the U.S. faces an impending crisis in voting technology.” Though Nate Persily and the commission did not, though experts tendered the information, specify General Public License open source software as the solution to the crisis, most experts agree that it is time for the voting systems to move away from the vendor sold proprietary ” secret software ” model toward publicly owned systems. The U.S. House of Representatives has announced moving toward open source and there is hope election administrators are finally ( after a decade of prompting ) paying attention. The caveat is that as open source has gained traction business operatives have begun the practice of ” open washing ” i.e. declaring software that does not fall within standards as open source. Los Angeles County and Travis County has received full information and education that ” OPL – Open Public License ” does NOT qualify as open source per Open Source Initiative or other regulatory open source standards boards, but they have not yet declared their licensing structure. Failure to adhere to stated general Public License /open source standards will result in proprietary elements and will lessen transparency and heighten costs. For these reasons the open source community is not celebrating the Los Angeles project but rather merely watchful as the project has not yet embraced basic open source philosophy of transparency and sharing. The concern is that the same Silicon Valley interests that received the exorbitant sole source ” design ” contract will also absorb the software contract, leaving L.A. County in no position to lead, but rather an example of carelessness with regard to public funds. and best security methods.

  2. Hello, of course this post is in fact good and I have learned lot of things from
    it regarding blogging. thanks.

  3. Hi there mates, its fantastic post on the topic of educationand fully defined, keep
    it up all the time.

  4. Hello, i think that i saw you visited my site so i got here to go back the want?.I’m trying to to find things to enhance my website!I suppose its adequate
    to use a few of your ideas!!

  5. I’m gone to tell my little brother, that he should also visit this blog on regular basis to get updated from most recent reports.

  6. You should take part in a contest for one of the
    highest quality blogs on the net. I will recommend this web site!

  7. Very good post. I certainly appreciate this website.
    Continue the good work!

  8. Great blog right here! Additionally your website loads up fast!
    What host are you using? Can I am getting your associate link for your host?

    I want my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  9. Great blog you’ve got here.. It’s difficult to find excellent writing like yours these days.

    I truly appreciate people like you! Take care!!

  10. Having read this I believed it was really informative.
    I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this content together.
    I once again find myself spending way too much time both reading and posting comments.
    But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  11. What’s up, after reading this amazing paragraph i am too glad to share my familiarity here with
    colleagues.

  12. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this superb blog!
    I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
    I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this site
    with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  13. I comment when I like a post on a site or I have something to contribute to the conversation. It is a result
    of the passion displayed in the post I browsed.
    And on this article Los Angeles County Goes Hollywood: Bloomberg Profile of New
    Voting System | Election Academy. I was actually excited enough to leave a comment 😉 I actually do have a couple of
    questions for you if you usually do not mind. Is it simply me or do a few of the remarks appear like left by brain dead individuals?
    😛 And, if you are posting on other places,
    I would like to keep up with you. Could you list all of your public
    sites like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?

  14. I used to be recommended this website by my cousin. I am no longer sure whether
    this publish is written by means of him as nobody else recognize such unique about my
    trouble. You are wonderful! Thank you!

  15. My family members all the time say that I am wasting my time here at net, however I know I am getting
    experience everyday by reading such pleasant content.

  16. I am actually thankful to the holder of this web site who has shared this fantastic post at at this place.

  17. Tuh belom mulai main aja uda untung banget.

  18. Thank you, I’ve juѕt been searching fоr infօrmation ɑpproximately tһis topic fⲟr a
    ԝhile and yours is the bеѕt I have found out so faг.
    Hoᴡever, ѡhat conccerning the conclusion? Are yоu сertain about tһe
    source?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*