[Image courtesy of flickr user smaedli via Radiolab]
In keeping with the spirit of Throwback Thursday, I found this entry in the archives and thought I’d share since it’s a constant challenge in the field of elections. Enjoy!
Originally posted 9/20/2011
A recent podcast on WNYC’s Radiolab focused on a question raised by one of their guests, writer Ian Frazier. Specifically, while researching a book, Frazier lived with a Russian family whose 6-year-old son who had never heard of the game tic-tac-toe. Frazier then asked around and discovered that none of the Russians he spoke to had ever heard of the game.
That led the Radiolab hosts to conduct an experiment to crowdsource an answer to the question: What are the boundaries of tic-tac-toe-dom? Listeners from around the world responded to the call for help and proceeded to ask (and audiotape) people across the globe about tic-tac-toe. The results were striking; huge areas of the globe had never heard of tic-tac-toe, leading the hosts to speculate that Frazier, who had been happily (if not shamelessly) dominating play with his 6 year old housemate, could achieve world-champion status in international tic-tac-toe competition.
But then the team changed the assignment. This time, interviewers showed people the familiar 3×3 grid and asked if they’d seen the game – and not surprisingly, they had. Maybe they didn’t call it tic-tac-toe, but the same game was very familiar to people around the globe by a host of different names. [If you want to hear some of these, skip ahead to about the 10:00 mark in the podcast.]
Now, the experiment itself might not have been the most groundbreaking or scientific (a point hammered into submission in the comments on the podcast page), but the lesson learned was valuable nonetheless. Language may make communication possible, but sometimes it can get in the way when we fail to recognize that similar concepts can have a wide variety of names. [UPDATE 1pm: Apparently this little dead end didn’t hurt co-host Jad Abumrad, who just received a 2011 MacArthur Fellowship for his work on Radiolab.]
This is a particular problem in the field of elections, where decentralized control means that it is possible to have fifty or more separate languages in play simultaneously. Through my years in the field, I have discovered that these multiple languages mean that comparing election laws, practices and procedures across jurisdictions isn’t so much a problem of “apples to oranges” as it is the whole fruit salad.
The danger of the “fruit salad problem” is that officials and policymakers in each jurisdiction can assume – just as the Radiolab hosts initially did – that their system is as unique as their terminology. What can get lost as a result is the opportunity to identify common best practices and cautionary tales that could benefit voters in multiple states.
There have been efforts over time to build a common language as part of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s Election Day Survey, but these are still in their infancy. Here at Humphrey’s election administration program, we look forward to being part of future conversations – and we look forward to the day when the language we use is familiar to all.